Logo
REQUIRED FIELDS
Email
Confirm Email
I prefer to receive emails in HTML format
OPTIONAL FIELDS
First Name
Last Name
Preferred Phone
Company Name
 
 
 
Please select the lists you want to sign up to:
  • Help Me Find Right Job / Major
  • Help Me Implement Lasting Change
  • Help Me Improve Productivity
  • Help Me Improve Team Dynamics
  • Supply Chain Optimization / Integration
  • Project / Program
  • Distribution & Logistics
Unsubscribe

We accept credit cards as a convenience to our clients and there is a 5% convenience fee for each charge.

A manufacturer of recreational vehicles had been in business for over 30 years; its  management team was seasoned and production lines were efficient. But the rate of failures in their new production hires was simply unacceptable. A worker hired today had a less than 50 percent chance of still being on the job after six months.

The hiring process was a familiar one, with a candidate’s application reviewed by HR, a preliminary interview by an experienced interviewer in the HR department, and a final interview and decision by the manager who would supervise the new hire. The company introduced the Step One Survey II®, administering it to every applicant who had been invited to participate in an interview. For the first 150 assessments, results were not provided to the hiring team. Data was collected on retention, firings and on-job injuries.

Based on this data, a criterion was established for a recommendation to consider for employment. In the next year, the hiring team was provided with the assessment reports, used the structured interview questions and considered the information as a part of their overall hiring process. Candidates who did not meet the criterion on the assessment were not considered for hire. As the graph below illustrates, the new hire failure rate dropped dramatically, as did involuntary terminations and injuries.
 
In the next year, the company’s sales skyrocketed, and production was geared up, requiring a wave of new hires. HR, faced with a limited pool of applicants and pressure to “fill the seats,” abandoned the use of the criterion on the assessment. The “No Criterion” interval on the graph shows the results: all three measures rebounded to pre-assessment levels and above. Assessing the cost of this “natural experiment,” management has directed HR to reestablish the criterion in the hiring process and is considering the addition of a job matching assessment to the selection process.
 

 


Product Inquiries: Call (502) 561-3451.  Career Inquiries: email us
 
Information you submit through this site is used to contact you and will not be sold or distributed to third parties.
 
Green Web Hosting